Friday, April 30, 2010
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Monday, April 26, 2010
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Why call it a three-part test...
...when you're pressured to only use one?
The Obama administration is playing politics with Title IX. I guess they're tying to lock up the Title IX attorney vote for the next election...might want to remind them they're losing the wrestler and swimmer vote, though...
Proportionality (prong 1) is destroying men's opportunities. The OCR knows it. They've recommended that schools use surveys (prong 3). So, why are we still debating this?
From the Office of Civil Rights:
...OCR uses the three-part test to determine whether an institution is providing nondiscriminatory athletic participation opportunities in compliance with the Title IX regulation. The test provides the following three compliance options:
1. Whether intercollegiate level participation opportunities for male and female students are provided in numbers substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments; or
2. Where the members of one sex have been and are underrepresented among intercollegiate athletes, whether the institution can show a history and continuing practice of program expansion which is demonstrably responsive to the developing interests and abilities of the members of that sex; or
3. Where the members of one sex are underrepresented among intercollegiate athletes, and the institution cannot show a history and continuing practice of program expansion, as described above, whether it can be demonstrated that the interests and abilities of the members of that sex have been fully and effectively accommodated by the present program.
Why waste the ink to print parts two and three if the government won't support their use?
The latest from OCR:
Unlike the 2005 Additional Clarification, the letter makes clear that OCR considers multiple indicators in evaluating compliance with Part Three and will not accept an institution’s reliance on a survey alone, regardless of the response rate, to determine compliance.
Suppose 100% of the students respond to a survey, and 100% of respondents want to save the men's swim team at a given school.
Think that matters?
It doesn't!
The OCR won't support the school if it cannot show that its gender numbers in athletics mirror those in the undergrad populations.
I guess it's a lesson that teaches college students about the real world:
Your representatives don't represent you - they represent the special interests that helped them grab power and keep it.
The Obama administration is playing politics with Title IX. I guess they're tying to lock up the Title IX attorney vote for the next election...might want to remind them they're losing the wrestler and swimmer vote, though...
Proportionality (prong 1) is destroying men's opportunities. The OCR knows it. They've recommended that schools use surveys (prong 3). So, why are we still debating this?
From the Office of Civil Rights:
...OCR uses the three-part test to determine whether an institution is providing nondiscriminatory athletic participation opportunities in compliance with the Title IX regulation. The test provides the following three compliance options:
1. Whether intercollegiate level participation opportunities for male and female students are provided in numbers substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments; or
2. Where the members of one sex have been and are underrepresented among intercollegiate athletes, whether the institution can show a history and continuing practice of program expansion which is demonstrably responsive to the developing interests and abilities of the members of that sex; or
3. Where the members of one sex are underrepresented among intercollegiate athletes, and the institution cannot show a history and continuing practice of program expansion, as described above, whether it can be demonstrated that the interests and abilities of the members of that sex have been fully and effectively accommodated by the present program.
Why waste the ink to print parts two and three if the government won't support their use?
The latest from OCR:
Unlike the 2005 Additional Clarification, the letter makes clear that OCR considers multiple indicators in evaluating compliance with Part Three and will not accept an institution’s reliance on a survey alone, regardless of the response rate, to determine compliance.
Suppose 100% of the students respond to a survey, and 100% of respondents want to save the men's swim team at a given school.
Think that matters?
It doesn't!
The OCR won't support the school if it cannot show that its gender numbers in athletics mirror those in the undergrad populations.
I guess it's a lesson that teaches college students about the real world:
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Back to War
Remember that report from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights a couple of weeks ago? That non-partisan report recommended surveys to prove Title IX compliance rather than using proportionality.
No? Catch up here.
Seems the Obama administration is doing exactly the opposite of what the commission suggested and will instead step up their witch hunt as they search for schools out of compliance.
Look for many more men's athletics teams to bite the dust over the next three years as the liberal lawyers have a field day with this one.
Got the heads up via Saving Sports.
Read about it in The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a law professor and senior director for advocacy with the Women's Sports Foundation, said female participation in sports is the most effective remedy against obesity and leads to more education and better employment prospects.
"That's why all of this is so important," she said.
No, Nancy, that's not why this is so important.
Now, with the full support of the jackasses in Washington, D.C., folks like Hogshead-Makar can continue to win judgements throughout the land. All they need to do is find one disgruntled coach/athlete in an otherwise happy athletic department and away they'll go.
It's for the money - that's why all of this is so important...
No? Catch up here.
Seems the Obama administration is doing exactly the opposite of what the commission suggested and will instead step up their witch hunt as they search for schools out of compliance.
Look for many more men's athletics teams to bite the dust over the next three years as the liberal lawyers have a field day with this one.
Got the heads up via Saving Sports.
Read about it in The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a law professor and senior director for advocacy with the Women's Sports Foundation, said female participation in sports is the most effective remedy against obesity and leads to more education and better employment prospects.
"That's why all of this is so important," she said.
No, Nancy, that's not why this is so important.
Now, with the full support of the jackasses in Washington, D.C., folks like Hogshead-Makar can continue to win judgements throughout the land. All they need to do is find one disgruntled coach/athlete in an otherwise happy athletic department and away they'll go.
It's for the money - that's why all of this is so important...
Monday, April 19, 2010
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Friday, April 16, 2010
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Monday, April 12, 2010
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Friday, April 09, 2010
Quote of the Day
Destiny is no matter of chance,
it is a matter of choice.
Thursday, April 08, 2010
Wednesday, April 07, 2010
Tuesday, April 06, 2010
Monday, April 05, 2010
Quote of the Day
Enjoying success requires the ability to adapt.
Only by being open to change will you have a
Sunday, April 04, 2010
Protests at UC Davis
While they're not yet sure who's getting the ax, student-athletes at UC Davis are making it known that they won't be going quietly. Read more and watch the video here. Slide show is here.
Will swimming be demoted to club status?
About a dozen factors will be considered, including gender equity and compliance with Title IX regulations, conference affiliation and budgetary considerations, Warzecka said.
The school has 15 protected sports – six men's teams and nine women's teams – that will not be cut because of their Big West Conference affiliation, Warzecka said. Those include men's basketball, baseball, soccer, outdoor track, cross country and golf.
Also safe are women's basketball, volleyball, soccer, softball, outdoor track, cross country, golf, tennis and water polo, he said.
The football team was reviewed "and at this point we feel it's a tradition at UC Davis and one of the cornerstones of the university's athletic program." Warzecka said.
Warzecka doesn't think fundraising will solve the money problems:
The student athletes said they will finance their own teams through donations. "We need a chance to raise our own money," said swimmer and water polo player Heidi Kucera.
But Warzecka said short-term fundraising "just continues the program in a precarious way year after year without any permanent allocation of resources."
If a team's fundraising falls short and it doesn't come up with enough money to pay its own way, "we start getting into a deficit situation once again," he said, and the remaining sports could suffer.
Will swimming be demoted to club status?
About a dozen factors will be considered, including gender equity and compliance with Title IX regulations, conference affiliation and budgetary considerations, Warzecka said.
The school has 15 protected sports – six men's teams and nine women's teams – that will not be cut because of their Big West Conference affiliation, Warzecka said. Those include men's basketball, baseball, soccer, outdoor track, cross country and golf.
Also safe are women's basketball, volleyball, soccer, softball, outdoor track, cross country, golf, tennis and water polo, he said.
The football team was reviewed "and at this point we feel it's a tradition at UC Davis and one of the cornerstones of the university's athletic program." Warzecka said.
Warzecka doesn't think fundraising will solve the money problems:
The student athletes said they will finance their own teams through donations. "We need a chance to raise our own money," said swimmer and water polo player Heidi Kucera.
But Warzecka said short-term fundraising "just continues the program in a precarious way year after year without any permanent allocation of resources."
If a team's fundraising falls short and it doesn't come up with enough money to pay its own way, "we start getting into a deficit situation once again," he said, and the remaining sports could suffer.
Saturday, April 03, 2010
Friday, April 02, 2010
Victory?
Could this be the end of gender quotas in college athletics? If so, it's about time!!!
A civil rights commission report released yesterday suggests that using surveys is the way to go.
Read the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report here. Read an article from Inside Education here.
In a letter prefacing the report addressed to President Obama and Congressional leaders (each of whom are responsible for appointing four commissioners; most are Bush-era appointees), the commission chair Gerald A. Reynolds wrote that the survey was “the best method for attaining prong three compliance because it provides a reliable and rigorous method of ascertaining student interest in athletics.”
Melendez and Yaki countered that the survey "is far from rigorous and suffers from many substantive and methodological flaws," which they detailed in their rebuttal.
Heading off criticism about persistent gender disparities, the report suggests that "since female students are fully capable of expressing interest in athletics, or lack thereof, advocates for particular views on Title IX compliance should not devalue or dismiss their perspectives."
The commission also recommends that regulations be revised "to explicitly take into account the interest of both sexes rather than just the interest of the underrepresented sex." It adds: "This would help to restore Title IX to its original goal of providing equal opportunity for individuals of both sexes."
Expect plenty of howling from the "Don't bother us with the facts, this is how we feel!" crowd...
A civil rights commission report released yesterday suggests that using surveys is the way to go.
Read the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report here. Read an article from Inside Education here.
In a letter prefacing the report addressed to President Obama and Congressional leaders (each of whom are responsible for appointing four commissioners; most are Bush-era appointees), the commission chair Gerald A. Reynolds wrote that the survey was “the best method for attaining prong three compliance because it provides a reliable and rigorous method of ascertaining student interest in athletics.”
Melendez and Yaki countered that the survey "is far from rigorous and suffers from many substantive and methodological flaws," which they detailed in their rebuttal.
Heading off criticism about persistent gender disparities, the report suggests that "since female students are fully capable of expressing interest in athletics, or lack thereof, advocates for particular views on Title IX compliance should not devalue or dismiss their perspectives."
The commission also recommends that regulations be revised "to explicitly take into account the interest of both sexes rather than just the interest of the underrepresented sex." It adds: "This would help to restore Title IX to its original goal of providing equal opportunity for individuals of both sexes."
Expect plenty of howling from the "Don't bother us with the facts, this is how we feel!" crowd...
Thursday, April 01, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)