NFHS Rule Change Proposals
If you're on the NISCA email list, you should have gotten a message with swimming/diving rule change proposals.Note that while none of the proposed changes deal with automatic relay take-off judging, there is one that could have altered the outcome of this year's 5A girls' state meet.
An addition (submitted by NFHS Rules Review Committee) to Rule 4-1-3:
ART. 3… The referee’s authority begins upon arrival at the meet site and concludes after the official score has been established within one hour after the last event results are final. The meet referee maintains administrative responsibilities for the contest through the completion of any required reports or correspondence in response to any action occurring while the officials have jurisdiction. State associations may intercede in the event of unusual incidents after the officials’ jurisdiction has ended or in the event that a meet is terminated prior to the conclusion of regulation competition.
Rationale: Administrative duties for meet officials may need to continue after the contest to document actions which occur during the competition. This revision illustrates the difference between the meet officials’ jurisdiction during the competition and other administrative responsibilities such as submitting specific reports after the competition is completed. In addition, clarifies that State Associations may continue to develop and implement policies that allow for review of unusual incidents that occur while the meet officials have jurisdiction or after the competition is completed.
This and other rule changes will be discussed and voted on at the NISCA meeting in Minneapolis next week.



4 Comments:
At 3:53 PM,
Anonymous said…
Hopefully it is not too late to get a relay rule change in. Heard through the grapevine that a NFHS rule committee member didn't think the NFHS needed to change the rule but thought that Texas needed to 1. understand that a suggested protocol is just that and 2. stop using this equipment as it is known to have potential for failure and 3. could have overridden the DQs anyway by using the Meet Referee's authority along with the Meet committee. So many DQs in prelims should have caused the meet officials to take a second look and overrule the equipment - no rule stops that. And by the way coaches - no rule stops coaches from noticing that there were more DQs than expected, talk to each other and ask the meet committee to review everything.
At 4:06 PM,
Button said…
great point.
coaches, make sure you note who is on the meet committee when the meet referee announces it in your pre-competition meeting.
these are the people that may be able to help you in the event of an odd occurrence at a championship meet.
even if they cannot overrule a call, they have been selected to listen to your concerns.
if the meet committee is not announced, make sure you ask the referee who is on it.
At 10:49 PM,
Anonymous said…
Might also be a good idea, coaches, to carry in your clipboard an official notice of protest to hand to the meet referee in the case of an "unusual incident" since apparently any protest has to be written. In light of the lack of integrity of fairness that we saw on the part of the referee at the state meet, a signature line for a witness is probably not a bad idea either.
At 7:06 AM,
Button said…
maybe use ncr paper, like dq slips, so you can keep a copy?
honestly, i hope it doesn't come to that.
i think we need to avoid making this into a coaches vs. officials thing.
of the hundreds of officials i've worked with over the years, i can only think of a handful that i didn't feel were giving the kids a fair shake.
an overwhelming majority will - if there's any question whatsoever - give the athlete the benefit of the doubt.
as in coaching, it only takes one or two that don't appear to have the kids' best interests at heart to get the blood to boilin'...
Post a Comment
<< Home